Evaluating The Performance Of The Moot Court in Education with a Bibliometric Approach and Providing a Solution in The Field of Sports
Poster Presentation
Paper ID : 1446-SSRC (R1)
Authors
1هیات علمی ومدیر گروه
2دانشگاه تبریز
Abstract
Background: Moot court, first implemented in American law schools, is one of the new teaching techniques of the past few decades. This approach describes educational activities where students, under the supervision of academics, assume the roles of judges, prosecutors, lawyers, litigants, etc. and use court proceedings from judicial practice as a guide to simulate the treatment of a particular case. Numerous investigations have revealed that the term "moot court" is frequently used in conjunction with other concepts, like "education," but the absence of sports is striking.
Purpose: Thus, identifying the most significant writers, organizations, and nations in this sector is the goal of this study. In order to identify the most significant and frequently used terms in the literature, this study also examines the patterns of synonyms in this subject.
Methodology: The current study made use of the systematic review procedure. In order to do this, 135 articles from journals all around the world that were listed in the Scopus database were chosen to be the study's population. This number was lowered to 103 once the PRISMA protocol was put into place and some cases were removed. Software tools like VOSviewer, Rstudio, Excel, and Publish OR Perish were employed in this study to identify, measure, and assess the information that was available.
Results: The results indicated that, with 24 publications published, the United States had the most impact in this field. The universities of Loyola, Southern Illinois, and New England in this nation were also acknowledged as the most significant academic institutions. Lipovsky, JR, and Kammerer were also recognized as the most important authors in this area. Additionally, the most productive synonym patterns were taken out and presented as shapes.
Conclusion: Moot Courts are useful for developing policies, for arbitration and legal departments pertaining to sports, and even for sporting events. Additionally, the results of this study can be used to inform useful debates and analyses that enhance the procedures used in courts and the interpretation of sports-related laws.
Purpose: Thus, identifying the most significant writers, organizations, and nations in this sector is the goal of this study. In order to identify the most significant and frequently used terms in the literature, this study also examines the patterns of synonyms in this subject.
Methodology: The current study made use of the systematic review procedure. In order to do this, 135 articles from journals all around the world that were listed in the Scopus database were chosen to be the study's population. This number was lowered to 103 once the PRISMA protocol was put into place and some cases were removed. Software tools like VOSviewer, Rstudio, Excel, and Publish OR Perish were employed in this study to identify, measure, and assess the information that was available.
Results: The results indicated that, with 24 publications published, the United States had the most impact in this field. The universities of Loyola, Southern Illinois, and New England in this nation were also acknowledged as the most significant academic institutions. Lipovsky, JR, and Kammerer were also recognized as the most important authors in this area. Additionally, the most productive synonym patterns were taken out and presented as shapes.
Conclusion: Moot Courts are useful for developing policies, for arbitration and legal departments pertaining to sports, and even for sporting events. Additionally, the results of this study can be used to inform useful debates and analyses that enhance the procedures used in courts and the interpretation of sports-related laws.
Keywords